Sabrent Rocket Prototype Gen 5 SSD Hits 14 GBps, Could Be World’s Fastest
July 7, 2023
AMD Zen 1 Vulnerability Emerges, Dividing by 0 Can Leak Sensitive Data
August 10, 2023
The lowest end of the low end.
Intel's Alder Lake-N family of processors aimed at entry-level PCs has its own hierarchy and includes multiple options, including the flagship eight-core Core i3-N305, mid-range quad-core N97, and low-end dual-core N50. The latter belongs to a segment that represents little interest to performance-minded users, which is why such chips never get reviewed. But someone shared test results from the Intel Processor N50 in Geekbench (via @BenchLeaks).
Intel's Processor N50 features two general-purpose cores based on the Gracemont microarchitecture. Operating at 3.40 GHz, the chip comes with UHD-badged Xe-based graphics core with 16 EUs at 750 MHz and supports up to 16GB DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory. With a thermal design power of 6W, the CPU can serve various applications, including laptops, thin clients, compact desktops, and many other low-power things. What the SoC is not meant to offer is, of course, high performance.
Indeed, even single-core results of the Intel Processor N50 in Geekbench 6 CPU tests are significantly lower than those of the Processor N97 and Core i3-N305, which is unsurprising given its lower frequency. The multi-core score is predictably over two times lower than the N97 since this is a dual-core CPU.
As far as OpenCL compute performance is concerned, the Processor N50 comes with a severely cut-down integrated GPU that only has 16 execution units and runs at only 750 MHz. It cannot even compare to iGPUs of the N97 and N305 since they have more EUs that run considerably faster.
Of course, Intel's N50 can run productivity applications just fine, especially if it does not need to compute large XLS files or perform other resource-demanding tasks. Still, this CPU is generally meant to sit in a very simplistic machine that uses cloud resources or processes light workloads.
Geekbench 6 is a synthetic benchmark that does not necessarily represent performance in real-world applications, but when a CPU is times behind even entry-level offerings, it is evident that it is slow.